I think that there are things that we can all enjoy about this entire photo, a boy fading out of existence while giving his dog a goodbye. I just combined the image and played around with a few modes, contrast, and hue and made it just work together in a good blend.
It is very successful, I enjoy it and know that it follows whatever rules there may be. But either way it works so good.
1 Comment
1 Stephen Wilkes creates photos of both day and night combined together, it takes multiple images and the right lighting to make
2. When he says he is a street photographer he means he tries to catch the essence of the photo in an unmanipulated way. 3. Time lapse photographer typically makes their images look.... standard day to night, one side day and one side night through a rough line. With Wilke he uses all times of day to make you think and wrap your mind around the photo. 4 He manages to change time in a way that he makes a photo and basically puts it in a different time period as if all the evens in the photo were happening at once, for example, night at the Grand Canyon on one side, people looking off into the distance at it on another in the middle, pure day on the right, birds flying near the right middle Description: Well this is really not my best work of art but I attempted to make the lighting of the desk work for me as well as I was able to get ONE photo of form through a friend's phone and their flashlight that I thought looked somewhat cool.
Analysis: There is not much to say about any of these photos. They are horrible works of art in my personal opinion. It was all just me attempting to get good lighting within the few minutes that I was able to take these shots, though the pencil one just kind of intrigued me how I was actually able to pull it off without making it a total disaster This photo is what happens when you give me a good idea and a photo editor, there is not much to explain here, just a standard spongegar meme for middle aged and overly protected teens. I literally stole sponge gar and left it there
According to Erik Johansson the difference between realism and photo realism is human imagination
The 3 rules are; Images combined should have the same perspective, images combined should have the same light, and third to make it impossible to distinguish how it was taken and how it was made. He takes several photos to plan, and also plans the entire thing through. My idea is to take a picture of a tree horizon, then a circular saw up close, combine the two perfectly and make it look the saw is cutting the tree horizon down to the ground. Description: I generally think that most of these images were sloppily taken, (the steady hand maneuver is honestly not one of my strong talents.) Explaining these are as easy as the day I was born, as they are very simple pictures. But the description goes as followed. Simplicity at its finest. That is it. Simplicity at its finest. Nothing extravagant in the slightest.
Analysis: Silhouettes of various objects in which I attempted to take them with the feeling of simplicity in my mind. I generally like the picture in which I took a nice picture of a chess silhouette. It looked nice in my opinion. Interpretation: There is a story behind every one of these photos as there is a story behind all photos that come into your hands. No matter what the situation there is a story behind the nature of a photo and why the photo came to be. I am here to share that story of my photos with you all and hopefully give some insight into the reason these photos came to be. I guess I can start with the first one, the first photo came with the mindset of I feel that this photo will be useful later, preparing for the future and hopefully taking something beautiful with the resources that I had and I feel that I actually took something of a beautiful nature. The second photo had the inspiration of obviously chess, but not just chess, the playing of chess and the nature of chess. Moving your pieces around the board in hope to take the enemy king, and that is what is going to happen. the king will be taken and the game will be over, just as real war would be. The third picture and the fourth picture follows the nature of the motto "Not everything is perfect" That is honestly the truth, not everything is perfect and things are meant to be messed up and made into something beautiful by nature. They are both blurry and this hard to see but the value in the photo commes out in the mixture of colors due to the blurriness of the photo. And the last one's story is that nothing need be traditional and that things can change, it is a reverse silhouette in which i tok it with a black background and an orange-yellow object. Judgement: I like some of the photos, but I only really like such as last time, the message that I had in mind with the photos + Description: A selfie, plain old and boring and simple in style yet somewhat pleasing to the eye.
Analysis: I do actually somewhat like this photo, the colors just blend in such a way that is great for you to look at and somewhat calms you down. Interpretation: I really just wanted an authentic piece in which chess was involved, so i played a game of chess with myself and ended up wining in a stalemate with white. I know the photo may look like a checkmate but if you look closer black can actually take whites queen. I wanted to take this to show the cockiness of the human race, thinking you win but make a vital mistake in the end and end up either losing or having a "i'll take you with me" sort of ending. Its what we all end up having in the end, either being the winner or the loser. But the end the weak sharpen their mind while the strong sharpen their claws and even single man can take out an army with his wits. Judgement: Nothing really worked with me in the photo besides the message that the photo brings. But chess will always be in my heart and the photo will always be of significance. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2017
Categories |